The Better Food Journey
  • Blog
  • About
  • Blog
  • About

The Better food journey

Actionable ideas towards a world eating well
by Corinna Hawkes

Lived Experience as Food Systems Science

28/2/2021

13 Comments

 
Picture
February 17 saw the announcement of a new expert group to assess the need for an International Platform for Food Systems Science. Given the mutterings ongoing for years about the need for an “IPCC for food,” this is a welcome announcement. In assessing the science related to climate change, the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) has proved pivotal in generating and compiling the necessary evidence to make the case for change. Given food systems cover an even larger scope, it makes sense to start with a process of figuring out what value such a Platform might add and the form it could take.
 
The announcement set me thinking about the type of scientific knowledge needed to inform food systems change.  It’s been on my mind, too, with the preparations for the UN Food Systems Summit drawing both on formal scientific evidence (via its Scientific Group) and the knowledge of experience of people who work and engage in food systems (through the Action Tracks, Food Systems Dialogues and Champions Network). As the UN Special Envoy for the Summit, Dr Agnes Kalibata, has said: “It is all of these people who have the knowledge, insights, and understanding to help improve the system at large and make it more inclusive, more sustainable, and more resilient.”
 
This acknowledgement of the role of different sources of knowledge is commendable. Happily, too, the make-up of the new group (with experts from the natural sciences, law, economics and other social sciences), suggests a desire to gain insights from multiple disciplines. 
 
Into the knowledge mix, I’d like to put a large stake in the ground for the evidence generated by researchers observing, talking and engaging with people about their lived experience of food systems. In other words, evidence from qualitative research. Qualitative research tends to fall between two stools: it generates data, but not the numerical type typically associated with ‘science'; and while it’s about people's knowledge of their food systems, it analyses and interprets this data to produce new knowledge not necessarily held by the participants, for whom (like all of us) seeing the big systemic underpinnings of their every day experience is tough.
 
I’d argue this evidence is vital, especially when it comes to understanding why people eat what they do. Knowledge of why people make decisions about what to eat is made in the multiple systems in which people live their lives. Understanding how peoples' lived social, economic and psychological realities shape what they eat has huge implications for what policies and interventions will succeed or fail. 
 
Take, for example, the issue of food access. A large number of North American, European and Australian studies indicate a paucity of shops selling healthy food in deprived communities (in contrast to the plethora of ‘unhealthy’ ones). An intuitive policy response would be to introduce new stores, or have existing markets change their product offer. But by involving people who live in such neighbourhoods in taking photographs - as studies have done in urban Philadelphia and Madrid  - researchers ascertained it is the nature of social interaction in stores that really matters for shaping a healthier food environment, not just what they sell. In a more rural setting, a study conducted by the African Population and Health Research Centre in 2017 found that the Maasai community lacked adequate physical access to markets – yet participatory photo research methodologies revealed that empowering, supporting and including women in food and nutrition decisions was likely more crucial for addressing poor access and food insecurity than better transport. Both these examples indicate the extra value of engaging with the people experiencing the problem to inform the actions needed for effective change. 
 
It is noteworthy, as well, that a gender perspective tends to emerge from these studies. After all, they often reveal the stories of women who struggle to do their best feeding themselves and their families, women whose voices are rarely heard, whose experiences are often diminished.
 
This past week, colleagues from the Centre for Food Policy and collaborators from 20 different institutions published a document aiming to contribute to bolstering the legitimacy of this form of knowledge. Understanding Lived Experience of Food Environments to Inform Policy: An Overview of Research Methods names, categorises and exemplifies the different qualitative methods available to researchers to explore the decisions people make about food, and their response to existing policies and interventions. Methods include in-depth interviews, focus group discussions and photo elicitation to explore perceptions, beliefs and practices; observing practices in situ, such as on go-along tours or transect walks; and designing policy and interventions with people based on their lived experience, such as  co-create and co-design methodologies.

Researchers around the world committed to the rigorous and ethical application of such methods are now coming together into a Community of Practice, meeting regularly to discuss how to increase the quality and quantity of this evidence and work together to maximise its ability to inform change. At our meeting last week, we heard from three policymakers about their perspective on this type of knowledge. They - Esi Foriwa Amoaful, Director of Nutrition at Ghana Health Service, Tristan Gorgens, Acting Director at the Department of the Premier of the Western Cape Province, South Africa, and Veronica Graham, State Manager for Healthy Eating and Active Living Public Health in Victoria, Australia - sent us a clear message: this type of evidence is vital to bring alive what is really going on in people’s lives. It provides knowledge that speaks clearly to the policy-making agenda, and focuses on finding solutions that work.
 
So my wish for the new Expert Group is that they figure out how any new Platform might integrate this form of knowledge into the science of food systems. It’s the job of any scientist, in the broadest sense of the term, to look and listen closely, to see and feel beneath the surface, and to grasp what underlies the patterns that emerge. In this case, the researcher's task is to read the signs in the store, in the street, and at the stove. The lived experience they are privileged to witness, interpret and share must, surely,  form part of the diversity of scientific knowledge needed to inform food systems change. 


The Community of Practice referred to in the blog is convened by the Centre for Food Policy at City, University of London, UK and  CIRAD-IRD-SupAgro, Montpellier, France. To date it involves around 70 participants actively engaged in research on lived experience of food environments all around the world, from PhD student to Professors. If you are interested in participating please let me know.

I'd also like to thank Kimberley Neve, other Centre for Food Policy colleagues, and collaborators from the African Centre for Cities, African Population Health Research Centre, CIRAD, the Global Obesity Centre and the Institute for Health Transformation at Deakin University, Flinders University, GAIN, Gehl, The George Institute for Global Health, INRAE, Loughborough University, SupAgro, UNESCO Chair in World Food Systems, University of Alcala, University of Barcelona, University of Ghana, University of Greenwich,  University of Hertfordshire, and Wageningen University for their work on the Research Brief "Understanding Lived Experience of Food Environments to Inform Policy: An Overview of Research Methods" (Centre for Food Policy, February 2021).
13 Comments
Céline termote
8/3/2021 08:29:13 am

Hi Corinne,

We recently implemented a food environment study in Lodwar town and rural Turkana, a challenging remote and dry area, which included household perspectives on the food environment. About to implement it in other parts of Kenya as well. I'd be glad if I could join your community of practice (and so might some other members of my Food Environment and Consumer Behaviour research team in Africa). thanks Céline

Reply
M. Smith
16/11/2023 01:42:35 am

I am writing this to support discourse regarding the change in higher ed foodscapes and bring in the perspective of a simple operations manager. Much of the discourse that I will be drawing upon will be from the work of Michael Classens of the University of Toronto, Kaitlyn Adam of Trent University, and Sophia Srebot of the University of Toronto in their work "Food Systems Change and the Alternative Campus Foodscape" (Classens et al. 2022). https://www.foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/1163
Much of Classens et al.'s work revolves around three growing categories of study around this connection between higher ed institutions and their food systems, including alternative forms of procurement, campus food production, and critical food systems pedagogy (Classens et al. pg. 156). I hope to bring to this discussion an area that does not get enough attention from scholars and activists: policy implementation. This focuses on something other than the conversations at the top, between activist groups and the heads of institutions, but on the day-to-day staff and faculty that now interact with a changing foodscape. This is a conversation that I hope to facilitate via my own experiences and see if other people could add to this perspective on this discussion.
I am the Operations Manager at a Chicago-based University's Student Center/Union. I work closely with our contracted food services provider, Chartwells. Its parent companies, Compass Group, ARAMARK, and Sodexo, are some of the largest privately for-profit food service providers in the United States and Canada (Classens et al., pg. 159). After being exposed to more literature regarding the changing foodscape in Chicago, I found a voice missing in implementing sustainability initiatives: the voices of the institutions that must make these changes. This year, our university has had three larger sustainably initiatives introduced and expanded upon:
A continuation and expansion of our urban garden.
The expansion of our Basic Needs Hub (food pantry).
The implementation of food composting within our dining halls.
It is truly inspiring to see how much the students are engaged in and care about this issue, and I am genuinely impressed by the changes they have implemented in the university. These initiatives are integral in campus community-building processes, where it is also shown to create students who take their activism off campus (Classens et al. pg. 164). Being on the implementation side of this change has given me a fascinating view of these initiatives. Looking at the Food Composting, where my department was tasked with ordering containers for the drop off of food, It was interesting to see where the activism stopped and the administration took over. All of the main parties agreed on the compositing. Still, in this agreement, they never reviewed the fine details of how the composting would be implemented, which was left to the administration to figure out. When it came down the pipe to the departments, no one wanted to take over overseeing the actual composting unit fully. Three different departments, mine included, would have to take over this additional task without any more guidance from the administration and limited guidance from the activists. This led to food rotting in the container for the first couple of weeks simply because no one knew who was tasked to do what. Something similar was seen in the expansion of the Food Pantry, where our department was tasked with overseeing the facility itself without additional support from the administration.
These wonderful and transformative initiatives that deserve attention are not getting the resources they need to flourish. When the administration takes over, the main goals of activists pushing for change are sometimes subverted. This is not intentional by the institution or simply a fallacy of bureaucracy. What I hope to come from this and what I would like to learn more about are other people's stories, their activism in higher ed, and their experiences in the change implementation stage.

Reply
weekly fanz link
23/7/2024 09:04:27 am

Regular visits listed here are the easiest method to appreciate your energy, which is why why I am going to the website everyday, searching for new, interesting info. Many, thank you 

Reply
slotimo link
27/8/2024 07:40:12 am


Your work here on this blog has been top notch from day 1. You've been continously providing amazing articles for us all to read and I just hope that you keep it going on in the future as well. Cheers!

Reply
꽁머니 link
11/3/2025 05:50:08 pm

Want to explore Toto without spending? Use 꽁머니.

Reply
스포츠중계 link
12/3/2025 05:43:31 pm

Enjoy 스포츠중계 without subscription fees.

Reply
온라인 슬롯 link
17/3/2025 10:10:46 am

Find endless entertainment and jackpots with 온라인 슬롯.

Reply
뉴토끼 link
24/3/2025 04:37:57 pm

There’s no better place for free webtoons than 뉴토끼.

Reply
블랙툰 link
24/3/2025 04:48:06 pm

Can’t get enough of the romance webtoons on 블랙툰.

Reply
가라오케 가격 link
25/3/2025 03:02:14 pm

We found an excellent deal on 가라오케 가격 with a drink package included.

Reply
블랙티비주소 link
30/3/2025 09:42:38 am

블랙티비주소 is the ultimate OTT site for all your needs.

Reply
블랙툰 link
31/3/2025 12:24:15 pm

If you're new to webtoons, 블랙툰 is the perfect place to start.

Reply
Ghibli AI link
1/5/2025 01:51:06 am

Great insights on the new expert group for food systems science! The nod to diverse knowledge sources, especially qualitative research, is spot-on. Lived experiences, like those revealed through participatory methods in Philadelphia or Maasai communities, add critical depth to understanding food choices. This holistic approach could truly shape effective, inclusive policies. Excited to see how this platform evolves! 🌾📊

Reply



Leave a Reply.

      Follow Corinna's blog

    Subscribe via email

    Recent blog posts

    All
    -Connecting Systems For COVID-19
    - Food Affordability
    - Food Environments
    -Food Systems Wish List
    Food System Transformation
    Leadership From The Ground Up
    - Lived Experience
    - Policy Coherence
    -Restricting Food Marketing To Kids
    -What Is The Food System For?
    -Women's Leadership
    - Young People's Voices

    Archives

    November 2022
    October 2022
    June 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    December 2021
    September 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020

    RSS Feed

Contact
© CORINNA HAWKES 2020. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Designed by one brave chick
Stock image supplied by Unsplash.com